<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - FILESAVE: can't save .docx after deleting header or footer" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81522#c14">Comment # 14</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - FILESAVE: can't save .docx after deleting header or footer" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81522">bug 81522</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jluth@mail.com" title="Justin L <jluth@mail.com>"> Justin L</a> <pre>(In reply to Justin L from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=81522#c10">comment #10</a>) > warn:chart2:25477:25477:chart2/source/tools/LifeTime.cxx:122: This component > is already disposed This error message can be seen already just during FILEOPEN and FILECLOSE. The chart code is full of comments like //behave passive if already disposed or closed or throw exception @todo? This particular notice seems to be be OK - old and new models wrapped around each other and cyclically disposing each other. Not that I know much about this, but it doesn't seem problematic to me... > warn:svl.items:25477:25477:svl/source/items/itempool.cxx:398: > old secondary pool: EditEngineItemPool of pool: XOutdevItemPool must be empty This error message also is seen during simply opening and closing the file. The IO exception ultimately comes from embeddedobj/source/commonembedding/embedobj.cxx:490: ::getCurrentState is disposed. Throwing DisposedException proposed avoidance fix at gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/99129</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>