<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - UI: a quick way to pick a ODF version on save" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134976#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - UI: a quick way to pick a ODF version on save" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134976">bug 134976</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com" title="Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com>"> Mike Kaganski</a> <pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=134976#c7">comment #7</a>) > (In reply to Mike Kaganski from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=134976#c6">comment #6</a>) > > ... we have the "Edit filter settings" checkbox in the Save As dialog. > > Bad solution IMHO. It interrupts the common and simple workflow of saving a > file It does not. "Interruption" is opt-in; any workflow that needs some special settings necessarily includes a step of defining those settings. > and presents the user a sequence of dialogs she has to go though with > no clear feedback what happens. For example, does clicking Save in the file > picker dialog mean the file is saved even when the follow-up settings dialog > is cancelled? which just means that we need to replace the checkbox with a button that opens the filter settings and returns into the save as dialog again.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>