<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - UI: a quick way to pick a ODF version on save" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134976#c12">Comment # 12</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - UI: a quick way to pick a ODF version on save" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134976">bug 134976</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com" title="Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com>"> Mike Kaganski</a> <pre>(In reply to Thomas Lendo from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=134976#c11">comment #11</a>) > I understand Mike's opinion to have settings where they are needed (would > solve some user confusions), but I feel upset when many settings will be > 'scattered' to different places in the UI. Note that having an insane amount of settings in a single place also makes them effectively inaccessible. I don't think that we must put the settings to too many different placed; however, I do believe that the settings should be accessible at the place where they are used. I believe that having the settings in a central place on a dedicated "filter settings" tab *could* be a nice thing; but at the same time, I disagree that a button on a dialog that allows user to open *that* configuration from a usage site counts as "scattering" the settings: they are still in the same central place, and you only have a shortcut. So IMO, if there's a need to have the settings in Options, then they must be arranged in such a manner that they be available through a shortcut (ideally in a limited way, i.e. the shortcut only shows the relevant subset/tab). The problem usually is not having the settings in different places; the problem is not having a system in that.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>