<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Crash specific undo/redo dance"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134436#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Crash specific undo/redo dance"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134436">bug 134436</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoffice.org" title="Buovjaga <ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoffice.org>"> <span class="fn">Buovjaga</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Thorsten Behrens (CIB) from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=134436#c4">comment #4</a>)
<span class="quote">> Hmm. There's an infinite number of those problems still lurking in Writer
> (which has used an early 90ties not mem safe programming paradigm) - I'd
> advocate not over-using severity critical (as the bugdoc itself was already
> crashing for the original reporter, in <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WORKSFORME - Crash in: mergedlo.dll"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=128497">bug 128497</a>).</span >
Severity: critical is semantically correct. Note that priority is merely
medium.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>