<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> <span class="fn">V Stuart Foote</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Calc: After changing date format, screen reader always reports default date format yyyy-mm-dd"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127063">bug 127063</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>erack@redhat.com, vstuart.foote@utsa.edu
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>UNCONFIRMED
</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>---
</td>
<td>WONTFIX
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Calc: After changing date format, screen reader always reports default date format yyyy-mm-dd"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127063#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Calc: After changing date format, screen reader always reports default date format yyyy-mm-dd"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127063">bug 127063</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> <span class="fn">V Stuart Foote</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>With 7.0.0b2 on Windows 10 Home 64-bit en-US with NVDA 2019.3.1 installed and
sounding.
No crash as for <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Crash when changing cell format code with NVDA running"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=132232">bug 132232</a>
I confirm the format change for the cell applies with the <Ctrl>+1 'Format
cells' dialog. But for the MM/DD format or the DD/MM format applied--the AT
sounds the date as a full date -- MM/DD/YYYY (maybe as taken from locales 'Date
acceptance paatterns'?).
Other date formats are sounded as they are patterned, including YYYY-MM; and
*all* including the MM/DD or DD/MM are identified as date formats to the AT.
So, long and short of it there is no real issue here. The DD/MM or MM/DD are
being passed as full format dates (the actual value held in the cell, not the
formatting). And the AT is sounding what it receives.
So, NOT A BUG, and not necessary to adjust as use case now is more helpful to
AT.
IMHO => WF</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>