<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - FILEOPEN: Glow effect paints the document yellow"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134583#c7">Comment # 7</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - FILEOPEN: Glow effect paints the document yellow"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134583">bug 134583</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com" title="Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Mike Kaganski</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>I don't see how a gallery element created using a pre-aplha LibreOffice with
unfinished feature implementation, where author obviously played with the
feature, may be considered a regression.
I don't know how galleries are generated in LO. The "Vertical-Scroll" element
in question has this:
<style:graphic-properties draw:stroke="solid" ... draw:shadow-color="#ffff00"
loext:glow="hidden" loext:glow-radius="25.4cm" loext:glow-color="#ffff00"/>
I can't find this grepping the code for "loext:glow", so likely we use some
blobs? So they need fixed (and in the future, not use unstable builds to
generate the data to be included in releases).</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>