<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [MOCKUP] LibreOffice "Format" menu mockup" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135417#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [MOCKUP] LibreOffice "Format" menu mockup" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135417">bug 135417</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:telesto@surfxs.nl" title="Telesto <telesto@surfxs.nl>"> Telesto</a> <pre>(In reply to Roman Kuznetsov from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=135417#c4">comment #4</a>) > Let's will not touch main menu > > -1 from me Would you mind to give some kind of explanation :-). I'm lacking telepathy skills. Ideally every element change should be discussed one by one. I'm do agree on a some of the suggestions. Others are more problematic. Like putting change case under a submenu (looks nicer, not sure how would be received). Putting crop settings together makes sense, IMHO. At some point we end up at the same discussion as the toolbar/tabbed interface. So different being able to set the 'old' menu configuration somewhere for enduser comp-ability reasons ;-) One of the arguments of NeoOffice using 4.4.7.2 as baseline was the menu structure. Not the best argument I have heard, but</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>