<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Change the default UI" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135501#c29">Comment # 29</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Change the default UI" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135501">bug 135501</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:vermelhusco1904@gmail.com" title="Pedro <vermelhusco1904@gmail.com>"> Pedro</a> <pre>(In reply to Thorsten Behrens (CIB) from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=135501#c25">comment #25</a>) > (In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=135501#c24">comment #24</a>) > > > > Caolan, Thorsten: What do you think about default and selection of MUFFIN? > > As said during ESC - generally in favour. Also siding with Caolan, that then > we'd want to limit the number of choices to perhaps 2 or 3 max (classic UI, > and one or two notebookbar flavours). > > How to make this least disruptive for existing users, and at the same time > keep help, documentation etc ~up to date is predominantly a UX decision > (perhaps with project-wide input). > > But broadly, the reason why the project implemented the notebookbar, is to > eventually have it as the 1st tier UI. ;) Since there seems to have been some discussion about this in the ESC meeting about this I would like to remark that 2 or 3 max UIs do not showcase the flexibility of LibO, which is one of the stronger points I would suggest that at least 4 UIs are presented. I would propose to remove from the old toolbar layouts the Single toolbar layout. >From the Notebookbar layouts I would remove the contextual layouts, and if necessary the Compact layouts. However, I think the Compact layouts are awesome, so I would keep them and increase UI choice to 6 layouts.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>