<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - EDITING: Drag and drop from Windows Explorer to Writer does not make OLE object" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135669#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - EDITING: Drag and drop from Windows Explorer to Writer does not make OLE object" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135669">bug 135669</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> V Stuart Foote</a> <pre>(In reply to Regina Henschel from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=135669#c4">comment #4</a>) > DnD creates an OLE-Object in Draw/Impress and in Calc, why not in Writer > too? I disagree with WF. Oops, your right as usual Regina. The DnD opens/unpacks the document onto sd Draw/Impress or sc Calc cell--why not to sw Writer canvas? So guess that is actually a bug? Checked and the DnD behavior (no response) is inherited from OOo with LO 3.3.0.4 release. But also, the DnD OLE gets default handling of copying into document (not linked), and of extracting into an OLE frame (no Icon view). A bit unwieldy compared to precision of "OLE Object..." insertion dialog--and maybe not what folks used to the MSO way expect being dropped as an Icon. When we do the same with an .ODT being DnD it by default is placed as a Section--rather than an OLE object.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>