<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:telesto@surfxs.nl" title="Telesto <telesto@surfxs.nl>"> <span class="fn">Telesto</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Formula's become blurred rendered images after DOC export"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136015">bug 136015</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Keywords</td>
<td>bibisected, bisected, regression
</td>
<td>bibisectRequest
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Formula's become blurred rendered images after DOC export"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136015#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Formula's become blurred rendered images after DOC export"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136015">bug 136015</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:telesto@surfxs.nl" title="Telesto <telesto@surfxs.nl>"> <span class="fn">Telesto</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to V Stuart Foote from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=136015#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> Bisection is not useful. Asking to revert a reversion ;-)
>
> Meanwhile Armin has moved forward with other work on primitive graphics. And
> bitmap gets the short end of the
> stick--<a href="https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/92048">https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/92048</a></span >
Happily to add bibisect again.. i'm pretty sure it did work... somewhere before
sw: Use primitive renderer for graphics.
However, as the commit states: revert it until a better solution is proposed
And I assume Use primitive renderer for graphics is part of moving forward. So
bisecting the point where it worked without this might be pointless..
Not a request to revert the revert.. or maybe it should be reverted and the
regressions fixed instead.. As the revert breaks things too..
So more an invitation to look at this again.. as the revert is also breaking
things</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>