<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Allow protecting only the format of a sheet" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132133#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Allow protecting only the format of a sheet" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132133">bug 132133</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:crl@chrblee.net" title="Christopher R Lee <crl@chrblee.net>"> Christopher R Lee</a> <pre>(In reply to m.a.riosv from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=132133#c7">comment #7</a>) > I think you are misleading what 'enhancement' means, this report is a > request for enhancement, a new option on sheet protection. It is not a bug, > something not working as should be. I would agree that ‘enhancement’ can include requests that are more important than ones that might be dismissed in the old jargon as ‘nice to have’. However, I think the present subject falls into a category that might be defined as ‘major functionality inexplicably omitted from user-requirements and design specifications’. It may not, therefore, be a suitable subject for the bug reporting environment. Here, I’d define ‘major functionality’ as something people working in major fields such as business and education expect to find, and can’t do without. To judge from the plethora of information on the web about the corresponding function in MS Excel, it is in widespread use - though apparently not as easy to use as some users would like ! Potential users of LO might consider an omission like this symptomatic of design and user feedback procedures needing revision, and may walk away without providing any kind of feedback.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>