<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Make font installation optional" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91886#c16">Comment # 16</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Make font installation optional" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91886">bug 91886</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:fitojb@ubuntu.com" title="Adolfo Jayme <fitojb@ubuntu.com>"> Adolfo Jayme</a> <pre>The Noto fonts have precious value for us because they give us wide language support. The Source fonts, on the other hand… not so much. After reading you, Mike, I came to the conclusion that bundling the Source fonts was a mistake (I proposed Source Serif back in the day). Another reason for their removal: Adobe will mess up with the font’s names to add version numbers, which will break users’ documents on upgrades. So we better remove them now from our build and our templates before this causes us more damage.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>