<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Writer repeatedly rewrites screen during document load" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122792#c14">Comment # 14</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Writer repeatedly rewrites screen during document load" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122792">bug 122792</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoffice.org" title="Buovjaga <ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoffice.org>"> Buovjaga</a> <pre>(In reply to Christian Lehmann from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=122792#c13">comment #13</a>) > 1) Finding no issue with a document load time of 90 seconds for which MS > Word takes five seconds implies that LO Writer is not intended as a serious > alternative to MS Word. A pity. You gravely misunderstood: Telesto meant that he was not seeing a performance problem. Like I mentioned in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=122792#c9">comment 9</a>, the performance characteristics of the sanitised document might not match your original one. How does the sanitised attachment 148801 perform for you? I only see 7 seconds of CPU maxing out. Arch Linux 64-bit Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 2db30aa0206ca3d9d5a665d550820d8fcbcff4b9 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.8; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Built on 3 September 2020</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>