<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Too many ways of setting page styles (to portrait)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136348#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Too many ways of setting page styles (to portrait)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136348">bug 136348</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:telesto@surfxs.nl" title="Telesto <telesto@surfxs.nl>"> Telesto</a> <pre>(In reply to Justin L from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=136348#c5">comment #5</a>) For the record, 'wrap the mind around" or "Ultimately, that DOES make sense" is for equivalent for someone needs think about this again. If there is a way to 'make this more' natural. Ideally a mental exercise should be avoided. I have certainly already spend 5 minutes on figuring out how to rotate a single page in a document. Which I my exception should be a single mouse click away. So my mood deteriorates pretty quickly. Secondly I don't rotate pages all day; not routine action. So I tend to 'forget' how it should be done. So those 5 minutes tend to repeat itself. And I start to dislike software which doesn't do what I want it to do. So yes, the current implementation makes sense in ultimo. However, someone needs re-think this. Are there a few tweaks possible to make it work more natural at 85% of cases.. Maybe reducing the comfort for 15% of the actions. It would be still a benefit. Of course we are lacking an UX research department (with same budget as at Microsoft). So there is no way of knowing if people having issues with this. I assume so, as 'we' even tend to write 'wrap the mind around". And that's bad omen. Proposing alternatives is however an different topic, as we get on the 'brilliant' idea topic; of not getting the model. As this tends to be rather wired to number of cases. And overseeing all/most likely scenario's is already hard. And there are mostly multiple directions to go; with advantages an disadvantages. Some times multiple 'tweaks' must be made. But getting to a acceptable outcome is quite a thing.. Like me 'fulminating' at workflow for PS/CS/DF (or more specific the fight against how DF functioning). Maybe my taste; maybe looking from the wrong perspective. But there is certainly something not as it "supposed to be". Or phrase it differently: there is certainly room for improvement. As it's simple frustrating to use. Less flexible/ tolerant/ easy to work with compared to what it could be; IMHO</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>