<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Filling cells with incremental numbers – wrong numbers" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960#c23">Comment # 23</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Filling cells with incremental numbers – wrong numbers" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960">bug 55960</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com" title="Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com>"> Mike Kaganski</a> <pre>(In reply to b. from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=55960#c21">comment #21</a>) > to calm down: ex$el is only slightly better in these things, in this test it > has only one error in the first 62 lines instead of three (calc), and the > first error occurs in line 42 instead of 39 (calc), tested with ver. 2010, > winx64, It's not "slightly better". It's different. E.g., for case in <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - Drag-fill series produces values like 6.00000000000001" href="show_bug.cgi?id=129606">tdf#129606</a>, Excel produces 32 "wrong" values in first 90 cells, first one being in cell 56; while Calc does not produce a single one (after the fix in the mentioned bug). And that doesn't mean "Calc is better". As said, they are simply different in how they handle the inherent imprecision in different scenarios.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>