<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Pdfium based insertion of a PDF as image results in unwanted solid background, enhancement request to support break after insert (comment 4)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106581#c13">Comment # 13</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Pdfium based insertion of a PDF as image results in unwanted solid background, enhancement request to support break after insert (comment 4)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106581">bug 106581</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:vmiklos@collabora.com" title="Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com>"> <span class="fn">Miklos Vajna</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>See <<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - pdfium based ipdf defaults to 96 dpi for image, need an option for higher resolution"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=115811#c14">https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115811#c14</a>>, just
rendering at higher resolution is not a great idea.
For vector output, there are two problems:
1) Skia is the runtime-default on Windows, it's disabled on Linux/macOS by
default; so in case pdfium wants to do skia API calls unconditionally, we're
not there yet.
2) pdfium itself defaults to agg to produce pixel output, its skia backend is
still experimental, see
<<a href="https://pdfium.googlesource.com/pdfium/+/refs/heads/master/README.md#selecting-build-configuration">https://pdfium.googlesource.com/pdfium/+/refs/heads/master/README.md#selecting-build-configuration</a>>.
Both are possible to solve long-term, but don't expect an instant fix.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>