<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:iplaw67@tuta.io" title="Alex Thurgood <iplaw67@tuta.io>"> <span class="fn">Alex Thurgood</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - Libre Base SQL Syntax Unrecognized For FireBird DateAdd() Function"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136475">bug 136475</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>---
</td>
<td>NOTABUG
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>UNCONFIRMED
</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - Libre Base SQL Syntax Unrecognized For FireBird DateAdd() Function"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136475#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - Libre Base SQL Syntax Unrecognized For FireBird DateAdd() Function"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136475">bug 136475</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:iplaw67@tuta.io" title="Alex Thurgood <iplaw67@tuta.io>"> <span class="fn">Alex Thurgood</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>The same issue exists/existed with mysql and the DATEADD function (and has done
ever since I can remember, as I had to adapt my own queries to get this to work
at the time).
This could be seen as a limitation of the LO parser, but I have vague
recollection that when I argued for this in the past, it was counter-argued
that it would be impossible / too much work to implement and expect the parser
to know all of the intricacies of each version of SQL specific to any given
version of a DB engine.
Setting as RESOLVED NOTABUG</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>