<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [ENHANCEMENT] Proposal of a new "Paste Special" dialog box" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134802#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [ENHANCEMENT] Proposal of a new "Paste Special" dialog box" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134802">bug 134802</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:rafael.palma.lima@gmail.com" title="Rafael Lima <rafael.palma.lima@gmail.com>"> Rafael Lima</a> <pre>> - What's with the "Operations" actions of the current dialog? They're > missing in the proposal. I had left them out in the original proposal to make the dialog look "cleaner". I added them in the new proposal that has been attached as an ODG file. > - Are the "Custom actions" and "Shift cells" options linked together (in > opposite to the "Quick actions" above)? Then they should all be grouped so > that it's visible for the user that 'Paste All', 'Text', etc. and 'Don't > shift', 'Down' etc. are all part of the "Custom actions" and that they have > nothing to do with the "Quick actions". I considered them as a separate block for 2 reasons: 1) Shift actions use radio buttons meaning that only one can be selected, whereas Custom actions use checkboxes because multiple actions can be selected. 2) This separation is consistent with the current design; The main change I did was combining the existing "Options" section with the "Selection" section, which all use checkboxes. > Do we have metrics which option combinations are most used by LibreOffice > users? This would be useful, because I believe some actions are rarely used. I chose the buttons at the top based on my way of using Calc and also on the opinions of my students, who often use Calc and ask where some functions are.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>