<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Highlighting no fill is not the same as no fill; there is still direct formatting present according to paragraph style" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135871#c52">Comment # 52</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Highlighting no fill is not the same as no fill; there is still direct formatting present according to paragraph style" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135871">bug 135871</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com" title="Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com>"> Mike Kaganski</a> <pre>(In reply to Telesto from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=135871#c50">comment #50</a>) Oh. I tried hard to explain the problem to Telesto. Tried to explain the idea behind the feature; its intended user base; who exactly is the model user. In the end, answering Telesto's request for simple steps, I wrote roughly this: > See: here is a complex functionality, with involved mix of inheritance, > layers, dependencies, etc, which is very useful, but from Benjamin's PoV, > behaves almost randomly. > > =========> But here is the button created for Benjamin <========= > > after pressing which, the function becomes simple for Benjamin, at the cost > of masking all the complex machinery beneath. > > Now Telesto wants to break the behaviour of the button, in such a way that > using it results in another complex behaviour, potentially useful for some > power users, but still confusing for Benjamin. I hoped that it's rather clear for anyone, that if there is a functionality is created for some user base, then breaking it exactly for that user base is a no-go. Well, the reply is: > Yes, it's correct; but I fail to see why you say that it's OK above the > "=========> But here is the button created for Benjamin <=========", > but having the same below the line is inappropriate... Am I the one who, respectfully assuming due intelligence in the opponent, starts suspecting being trolled? I am done here, trying to "discuss" something with a troll and spammer, who floods Bugzilla with zillions of low-quality "reports" (unlike in the beginning); making one who sees "this bug authored by Telesto" to react like "ah, this is safe to skip".</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>