<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - LibreOffice 7.0.0.3 does not recognise JRE installation location at startup other than those in /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135462#c34">Comment # 34</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - LibreOffice 7.0.0.3 does not recognise JRE installation location at startup other than those in /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135462">bug 135462</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:war@rsb.at" title="war@rsb.at">war@rsb.at</a> <pre>(In reply to Stephan Bergmann from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=135462#c31">comment #31</a>) > (In reply to war from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=135462#c30">comment #30</a>) > > I upgraded brew: This eliminated the Java cask and up-(actually down-)graded > > to a JDK 14.0.1 which is now in the main download position > > (/usr/local/opt/openjdk) and not in a cask any more. > > > > However: after relinking openjdk in /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines LO > > (7.0.1.2) does not recognise any JRE at all. > > > > It is right there, I can call it from CLI, LO simply does not find it. > > Whatever you mean with "relinking", but I at least cannot help you with > getting your machine into a clean state again anyway. (All I can do is > point out my observations from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=135462#c22">comment 22</a> how LO does detect certain OpenJDK > installations. Even if those OpenJDK installations ultimately may not work > as expected when selected in recent TDF-provided LO builds, see <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - LO Complains about missing JDK when accessing any Java functionality, despite recognizing JDK on macOS under Preferences" href="show_bug.cgi?id=135479">bug 135479</a>.) "brew link java" links the binaries to the default path (/usr/bin). The machine is in a clean state. I even tried on a newly setup machine. LO 7.0.1.2 does not find OpenJDK 14 (homebrew or binary download). If I had a chance to find a log or something to single out the error I would gladly try to help. Lacking this tool, I can only describe what I observe: LO does not find a Java installation that lies right under its eyes. > > > @Stefan Bergmann: Re "file a new issue" > > So it never gets resolved? > > Not sure what you mean. (In <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=135462#c25">comment 25</a>, I asked Marc Grober, who had > provided some unclear information that might or might not be relevant for > this issue, to file a new issue for his observations if they are not > actually related to this issue. All in an attempt to keep this issue > focused---which generally is a good approach to let an issue eventually get > resolved :) Never mind</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>