<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - The left arrow key causes objects to disappear."
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278#c11">Comment # 11</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - The left arrow key causes objects to disappear."
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278">bug 136278</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:mdavidso@uw.edu" title="Mark <mdavidso@uw.edu>"> <span class="fn">Mark</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre> I ran it in flatpak, but the bug was still there. Does that tell us
anything interesting?
Does that mean I should go bother Canonical? System76? The Debian
Project? Does this mean The Document Foundation doesn’t consider this their
problem? Ubuntu and its forks are very popular. I would think that if
LibreOffice doesn’t run reliably on them, The Document Foundation would
consider that a problem. This is a big bug. I’ve only shown you a
manifestation that is easily reproduced in a small file. I’ve seen others.
What’s the next move? Is it yours or mine?
It occurs to me that notourbug might be premature. There might be a
bug after a line that looked something like this:
#ifdef DEBIAN
That would be a LibreOffice bug that was restricted to the Debian family of
distributions, which is consistent with what we see.
If the problem was in Ubuntu, and if the Document Foundation took it
on, you could do the following:
Step 1: Identify the call within Impress that Ubuntu was responding to
inappropriately.
Step 2: Report the bug to Canonical.
I can only do step 2. In that case it would be entirely reasonable for
Canonical to say, “This is a bug within LibreOffice.” Without step 1 I could
end up with The Document Project and Canonical pointing fingers at each other,
and the bug going unresolved.
Yet another thing occurs to me. Note that BogdanB could not reproduce
the bug in anything prior to 6.4.4.1. This suggests that something happened
between 6.4.3.2 and 6.4.4.1 that made it incompatible with Ubuntu. That would
make it your bug.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>