<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Writer sidebar minimum width is too wide when docked" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947#c18">Comment # 18</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Writer sidebar minimum width is too wide when docked" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947">bug 131947</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:christianw_lehmann@arcor.de" title="Christian Lehmann <christianw_lehmann@arcor.de>"> Christian Lehmann</a> <pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=131947#c16">comment #16</a>) > Understand this as a Windows bug since the sidebar width is okay on Linux. > > As a general comment, the design team discussed the topic. The initial width > of the sidebar should be defined by the deck with the larges controls. By > doing so we avoid jumping UIs. But we also want to allow users to reduce the > sidebar width per deck. No deck should be resizable beyond the width of its > controls (it's always possible to collapse the sidebar or hide completely). > Switching between decks must not change the user defined width of the deck. It is also a Linux bug. I reported on this a few weeks ago concerning LO 7, documenting with a video; but my bug report has somehow disappeared. Current (version 7.0.2.2) behavior is as follows: Opening the Styles sidebar (CTRL-F5) puts it to the width of 8 icons arranged horizontally on its top bar. The user can even (and unnecessarily) _expand_ this further; but he is not allowed to shrink it. This was allowed in earlier LO Writer versions. To allow for it does not mean satisfying discretionary whims of users. It simply makes no sense to make this sidebar wider than the longest style name listed in it.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>