<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - FORMATTING: redundancy in content.xml"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136434#c8">Comment # 8</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - FORMATTING: redundancy in content.xml"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136434">bug 136434</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com" title="Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Mike Kaganski</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Mike Kaganski from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=136434#c7">comment #7</a>)
<span class="quote">> It's also interesting, how much normal ODT takes, which indeed also
> has all the redundancy, compared to DOCX.</span >
And note that the XML schema of OOXML was designed with the goal of using short
names for most often used XML elements (like 'w:p', 'w:r' in Word, or <c r="A1"
t="s"><v>0</v></c> for cells in Excel), while for ODF, the names were chosen
likely for easier readability (like longer prefix names for paragraphs/text
runs in Writer, or <table:table-cell office:value-type="string"
office:string-value="2020" calcext:value-type="string">... in Calc). This adds
to the XML size, but is not related to "redundancy".</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>