<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - ENHANCEMENT: Right Click context menu in the style inspector to modify style" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135110#c16">Comment # 16</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - ENHANCEMENT: Right Click context menu in the style inspector to modify style" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135110">bug 135110</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com" title="Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com>"> Mike Kaganski</a> <pre>(In reply to Mike Kaganski from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=135110#c15">comment #15</a>) > The "edit/delete single values" needs consideration. Because there are both > DF and styles there; do you suggest to allow editing both? I want to elaborate on what makes me cautious about this specific aspect. SI is a tool used in a place of current cursor. Its natural/intended use case is when someone inspects some place to understand why a visible result is produced. And it's reasonable to expect that user wants to "fix" something when the problem is identified. But it is the focus on a specific place that makes it dangerous to allow editing individual parameters of styles here: user might be tempted to "tweak this little thing here", to get the wanted result, only to see (or not see!) that it broke the things elsewhere - because it was a *style* that was changed. Only allowing to open style dialog when changing style properties could emphasize that it's style that is being changed (so the change has document-wide consequences)... So it all is not so simple as "give me that innocent-looking tool NOW!!!!". It all needs consideration.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>