<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [LOCALHELP] Writer: add info about submenu items for "Headings" context menu in Navigator" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135668#c27">Comment # 27</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [LOCALHELP] Writer: add info about submenu items for "Headings" context menu in Navigator" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135668">bug 135668</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:raykowj@gmail.com" title="Jim Raykowski <raykowj@gmail.com>"> Jim Raykowski</a> <pre>(In reply to sdc.blanco from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=135668#c24">comment #24</a>) > Created <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=166751" name="attach_166751" title="Two alternative ways to introduce enabling instructions">attachment 166751</a> <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=166751&action=edit" title="Two alternative ways to introduce enabling instructions">[details]</a> > Two alternative ways to introduce enabling instructions > > Attached are two different ways to explain the instructions about how to > enable Outline Content Visibility. As explained in the attached, one is > more "dramatic" than the other. > > I would suggest a more dramatic version if you think users should made aware > that it could be "dangerous" (in this case, such things as data loss, > anchors lost, frame positioning changed). > > Or if you assess that people are not likely to "break" things, then let's > use the less dramatic. I must trust your assessment here. I think the less dramatic version is fine with an addition of (may be unstable) which then would match the 'Enable experimental features (may be unstable)' checkbox label.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>