<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Provide arm64 or x86-64/arm64 Universal Binary builds for macOS on Apple Silicon"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138192#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Provide arm64 or x86-64/arm64 Universal Binary builds for macOS on Apple Silicon"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138192">bug 138192</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:telesto@surfxs.nl" title="Telesto <telesto@surfxs.nl>"> <span class="fn">Telesto</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>@Bouvjaga
Not directed to you personally (more mentor question). You might know question.
People are working on arm64 support (see <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - Support Apple Silicon (arm64) on macOS"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=138191#c5">bug 138191 comment 5</a>) and Apple
Silicon. It's even running already as far I understand.
However I don't know they lines well enough within TDF. This is not a pure
infra, pure dev call. Does TDF want to support even more eco-systems, is it
worth costs work. If not will this maybe result in a master builds server
somewhere else. See Online.
This includes they how to handle making returns topic. And internal
division/directionlessness drives me pretty nuts. As there is no consent at any
level BoD/MC/Members. While the world keeps moving on. I fear LibreOffice by
TDF will be hollowed out from within. I don't see any status quo. But more a
(partly) self-inflicted, self-full filling, fork in progress. I do see building
blocks already. If you can't join the, eat them :-). So LibreOffice attempting
to 'eat' OpenOffice (get them on board), while LibreOffice is eaten again?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>