<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:ming.v.hua@qq.com" title="Ming Hua <ming.v.hua@qq.com>"> <span class="fn">Ming Hua</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - sm nodes (holding roots, brackets) not scaling correctly in OLE on sd or sc canvas, but correct with sw; regression at LO 7.0.2 back ported into 6.4.7.1 (comment 16)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136891">bug 136891</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Whiteboard</td>
<td>target:7.1.0
</td>
<td>target:7.1.0 target:7.0.4
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - sm nodes (holding roots, brackets) not scaling correctly in OLE on sd or sc canvas, but correct with sw; regression at LO 7.0.2 back ported into 6.4.7.1 (comment 16)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136891#c31">Comment # 31</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - sm nodes (holding roots, brackets) not scaling correctly in OLE on sd or sc canvas, but correct with sw; regression at LO 7.0.2 back ported into 6.4.7.1 (comment 16)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136891">bug 136891</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:ming.v.hua@qq.com" title="Ming Hua <ming.v.hua@qq.com>"> <span class="fn">Ming Hua</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Aron Budea from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=136891#c30">comment #30</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Pierre C from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=136891#c28">comment #28</a>)
> > Will it be back-ported to upcoming LO 7.0.4 ?
> It was already reverted in the 7.0 branch, see <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Copied calc diagram in gdi format looks ok under linux, but the fonts looks weird under windows."
href="show_bug.cgi?id=127471#c17">bug 127471 comment 17</a>.
> Only the revert in 7.1 caused the build to fail, and had to be (re-)reverted
> and redone.</span >
Thanks for the explanation. I've updated the Whiteboard field to reflect this.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>