<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - When I edit the x-axis in a chart and save the file as .xlsx, the edit is lost." href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138385#c2">Comment # 2</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - When I edit the x-axis in a chart and save the file as .xlsx, the edit is lost." href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138385">bug 138385</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:stuart.soloway@ieee.org" title="SRS <stuart.soloway@ieee.org>"> SRS</a> <pre>After I have saved and reloaded the file, I can fix the x-axis format by expanding the width of the chart. So I think what is happening is this: 1) When I edit the x-axis major interval the first time, LO Calc is happy to update the chart as directed; it doesn't think the dates are too close. 2) When I save it and reopen it, LO Calc decides that dates on the x-axis are too close together to be displayed properly, so it reverts to the "automatic" setting for the major interval. It seems to use different standards for how close x-axis labels can be when the file is opened as opposed to when you initially set up the x-axis labels. Something else I should point out: When the x-axis is displaying incorrectly, the major interval has been reset by LO Calc to "automatic". BUT if I expand the chart so that the x-axis displays the way I want, then the major interval setting magically goes back to what I set it as, which was 7 days. LO Calc seems to have some hidden state that is very confusing. I should point out that if I create a chart that is too small to accommodate the x-axis labels at my desired frequency, it normally just uses some multiple of what I have set as the major interval. And it doesn't change my configuration setting.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>