<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WORKSFORME - Base Index Design not saved" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138091#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WORKSFORME - Base Index Design not saved" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138091">bug 138091</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:FKlusmann@aol.com" title="Fred <FKlusmann@aol.com>"> Fred</a> <pre>(In reply to Robert Großkopf from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=138091#c4">comment #4</a>) > (In reply to Fred from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=138091#c3">comment #3</a>) Thank you, Robert. > Could be we open a new bug, > which describes the problem the user seems to be allowed to change the index > for a primary key, but the message shows he isn't. > > The wrong message of the internal HSQLDB we couldn't change. It is a part of > the database ... I am still trying to learn Base. I don't know enough to suggest that any alteration to a Primary Key should be allowed. That was not what I was trying to do at all. If the SYS_IDX_XX are the primary keys (there are 5 visible - I have 3 test tables) then my logic says that modification should not be allowed. My real world case came about as 3 "Juan Albert Morales" enrolled in the same school, two with the same birthday. The third was born a day later. They all have the same father, different mothers (who say they did not know the others). > So there was something wrong in you user-profile, I have now idea. I don't know where to begin looking. All <<Tools><Options><LibreOffice><User Data> fields are blank (null?). Is it possible that the latest Java update did something? I know that one was installed in the last few days (now 1.8.0_251) Again, Thank you! -- Fred</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>