<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jluth@mail.com" title="Justin L <jluth@mail.com>"> <span class="fn">Justin L</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Full text highlight + shading support"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131920">bug 131920</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Severity</td>
<td>normal
</td>
<td>enhancement
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Full text highlight + shading support"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131920#c11">Comment # 11</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Full text highlight + shading support"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131920">bug 131920</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jluth@mail.com" title="Justin L <jluth@mail.com>"> <span class="fn">Justin L</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=131920#c6">comment #6</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Bart from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=131920#c2">comment #2</a>) who was suggesting the compatibility
> palette be "encouraged" for character highlighting, and selective export of
> highlight-compatible colours as highlight, and the rest as shading.
>
> Your proposal looks like a tremendous amount of work to fix Microsoft's issues.
> Do you think it's needed given that MSO's Theme Shading is not hard to find?</span >
I had initially come to the same conclusion as Bart. However, as Heiko notes,
that will be a tremendous amount of work since the current PaletteManager has
no capabilities for "special use cases". The most recent palette used is saved
in user settings and used for EVERY use case.
Also, Heiko is right about modern MS Word's shading tool being easy to find. At
first I compared shading to a permanent marker used on a whiteboard - really
hard to remove. But today, a better analogy is the difference between a
pencil/eraser and a pen/white-out.
Our current support for import/export of highlight works for the practical
cases, but isn't complete enough to handle the theoretical documentation. I
mean, MS Word doesn't allow the user to add highlighting to paragraph styles,
so the fact that we don't import or export "none" highlighting doesn't really
matter.
But it DOES matter if we start exporting colours as highlight in styles. So
Bart's idea of exporting the 15 colours as highlight is simple enough on the
surface, but it leads to a lot of other development work to support styles
properly. (It would be easy enough to do if it only applied to direct
formatting.) See <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - TABLE FORMATTING: DOCX, Paragraph background color set to 'No Fill' not persisted on save"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=137683">bug 137683</a> and <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - FILESAVE MS formats: Must not save char background as highlight in char styles. Only MS WORD problem"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=138345">bug 138345</a>.
So my conclusion after working on various parts of this for a week is that it
is not beneficial to export the 15 colours as highlight with the rest as
shading - just export them all as shading. Otherwise LibreOffice edits become
inconsistent to remove in MS Word.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>