<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - add object anchor markings to 'Toggle formatting' mode, to always expose location of the anchor(s)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138351#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - add object anchor markings to 'Toggle formatting' mode, to always expose location of the anchor(s)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138351">bug 138351</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org" title="Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org>"> <span class="fn">Heiko Tietze</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to V Stuart Foote from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=138351#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> more than just a change to icon for the anchor mark, the behavior of the 'to
> character' marks needs attention. Currently anchor is only visible when the
> images frame is selected. </span >
Which is an advantage, and the reason why a more striking color is acceptable.
There is no clear use case to me why always showing the anchor is desirable.
And I would also separate this discussion from the icon change. The latter is
simple and non-destructive (users who dislike a blueish anchor, for example,
can change the theme) while binding the visibility to any existing option is
changing the UX irrevocable.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>