<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - add object anchor markings to 'Toggle formatting' mode, to always expose location of the anchor(s)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138351#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - add object anchor markings to 'Toggle formatting' mode, to always expose location of the anchor(s)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138351">bug 138351</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> V Stuart Foote</a> <pre>@Heiko, no it was intentional. There was some misunderstanding of the issue as it was poorly stated. Thus it was not an easy hack. An adjustment to the icon was tangential. There is a substantive UX issue here for efficiently exposing the object anchors when the specific object (here the containing Frame of an image, or for Draw objects) is not selected active. Obviously continue to show the anchor and its dimension outlines on the canvas rulers *when selected*; but show the anchors for all objects with the other formatting marks when toggled enabled. Such exposure would provide visual hints as to content layout on canvas--more immediately needed with broader move to as-character/to-character anchoring and suppression of to-page anchoring. The whole class of anchors need to be better exposed visually on canvas--the <ctrl>+F10 toggle of formatting marks seems a reasonable control. While the individual anchor "types" should probably be labeled and color coded.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>