<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - LO Complains about missing JDK when accessing any Java functionality, despite recognizing JDK on macOS under Preferences"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135479#c42">Comment # 42</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - LO Complains about missing JDK when accessing any Java functionality, despite recognizing JDK on macOS under Preferences"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135479">bug 135479</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:sbergman@redhat.com" title="Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>"> <span class="fn">Stephan Bergmann</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Marc Grober from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=135479#c41">comment #41</a>)
<span class="quote">> Are we looking at different bugs?
> The fix for what appeared to be the bug that was originally complained of
> addressed JDK>12 on LO>=7
> The descriptions noted since the fix suggest there is now a problem with
> jdk11>
> Should a new bug be created rather than pursue this one, if indeed the
> current patch solves the originally posted bug?</span >
(Plus, the fix backported in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=135479#c34">comment 34</a> and <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=135479#c36">comment 36</a> should only be relevant
for --enable-macosx-code-signing builds, see <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=135479#c22">comment 22</a> and <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=135479#c23">comment 23</a>, which
the daily builds are probably not, anyway.)</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>