<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - UI: Merge Format Edit Sections with Insert Section" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138678#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - UI: Merge Format Edit Sections with Insert Section" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138678">bug 138678</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org" title="Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org>"> Heiko Tietze</a> <pre>(In reply to Telesto from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=138678#c2">comment #2</a>) > (A) I don't see 'sections' as 'formatting' ... You format the section. We can discuss if moving the command from Format to Edit makes sense since the context menu provides Edit Section. > (B) Format Section bring barely new functionality. Use case that requires this is: Insert a section, modify the content, and finally protect it. Admittedly, the Link attributes are destructive (there is another ticket). > (D) Lots of the settings in side Format > Sections look as a copy of Insert > Section It's the same dialog. Like with any other property dialog the goal is to edit what you have inserted before. > (E) I'm more the kind of managing 'sections' model. Which includes insert + > deletion. Locked/unlocked stuff are connected. So should be in the same > dialog. Don't get this. > (F) From my perspective the exclusive settings of Format -> Section can be > easily ported to Format > Sections. Neither this. > Very similar to "Insert > Frame" for a new frame and "Format > Frame"... Intentionally done. There are many Insert > * / Edit > * relations. =>NAB</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>