<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - ClearDirectFormatting does not remove page break" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138628#c19">Comment # 19</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - ClearDirectFormatting does not remove page break" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138628">bug 138628</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com" title="Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com>"> Mike Kaganski</a> <pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=138628#c18">comment #18</a>) > input here is welcome. I would certainly welcome this *setting*. Especially in the view of coming SI, which would make people see the DF, and then after clearing it, will see the remnants left. I definitely oppose the idea of more .uno commands, because (1) it is most probably a decision to make once for a user, if they want something cleared or not when using Clear DF; (2) adding such a UI (like Clear only character formatting, clear only paragraph formatting) will inevitably confuse users who do not realize that e.g. paragraph formatting includes character formatting, and so why selecting part of paragraph that was DF-ed to bold, and clearing DF, does not make effect? or changes the whole paragraph? The idea of additional commands is not what is asked here (make the function more self-consistent), it's introducing a new feature with a huge confusion impact in the view of the DF/style relations complexity.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>