<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Full text highlight + shading support" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131920#c15">Comment # 15</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Full text highlight + shading support" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131920">bug 131920</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jluth@mail.com" title="Justin L <jluth@mail.com>"> Justin L</a> <pre>(In reply to Justin L from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=131920#c11">comment #11</a>) > Our current support for import/export of highlight works for the practical > cases, but isn't complete enough to handle the theoretical documentation. I > mean, MS Word doesn't allow the user to add highlighting to paragraph > styles, so the fact that we don't import or export "none" highlighting > doesn't really matter. This is now fixed. We do export and import NONE highlighting now in 7.2. See <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - TABLE FORMATTING: DOCX, Paragraph background color set to 'No Fill' not persisted on save" href="show_bug.cgi?id=137683">bug 137683</a> and <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - FILESAVE MS formats: Must not save char background as highlight in char styles. Only MS WORD problem" href="show_bug.cgi?id=138345">bug 138345</a>. At this point, I think the importance of this bug is very low. The only thing I know of that cannot be done easily is to assign a new highlight as a direct character property.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>