<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Writer sidebar minimum width is too wide when docked (see comment 16 comment 22)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947#c29">Comment # 29</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Writer sidebar minimum width is too wide when docked (see comment 16 comment 22)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947">bug 131947</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:christianw_lehmann@arcor.de" title="Christian Lehmann <christianw_lehmann@arcor.de>"> Christian Lehmann</a> <pre>Ad <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=131947#c27">comment 27</a>, "No, allowing the Sidebar Deck and its Content panels to shuffle controls--to maintain visibility but loose context--is no solution, and would be worse UX than the simple 'slide hidden to collapse' of the original implementation." At the risk of misunderstanding the jargon: It seems that no argument has been offered in favor of reducing the user's screen space by a rectangle dominated by a stiff horizontal line of controls. If the suggestions for remedy offered by users do not seem to be workable to developers, then it seems to be their task to find a method of revising a wrong design decision.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>