<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Windows installer display tiny icon under high resolution" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138841#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Windows installer display tiny icon under high resolution" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138841">bug 138841</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com" title="Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com>"> Mike Kaganski</a> <pre>(In reply to V Stuart Foote from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=138841#c2">comment #2</a>) > Roman, Mike, * can the MSI itself be made dpi aware? MSI *is* DPI-aware. And all its dimensions are, in fact, in special units related to a font size scaled to the screen resolution [1]. It is obvious that our installer does follow the resolution properly on the screenshot, if you look at the top banner with "6". The problem here seems to be because of using ICO images for these specific problematic places (and Icon type in Control.idt), not BMP (and Bitmap type). The Icon type [2] has some bits that might be related, namely FixedSize and IconSize, and maybe we can just modify those, and not change the type. [1] <a href="https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/msi/installer-units">https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/msi/installer-units</a> [2] <a href="https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/msi/icon-control">https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/msi/icon-control</a></pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>