<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - UI: Being able use the option 'Save' Image without conversion" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138837#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - UI: Being able use the option 'Save' Image without conversion" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138837">bug 138837</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:telesto@surfxs.nl" title="Telesto <telesto@surfxs.nl>"> Telesto</a> <pre>(In reply to V Stuart Foote from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=138837#c2">comment #2</a>) > The source image is held in ODF archive, and is parsed to identify the image > type. > > Wouldn't a direct extraction of the image from archive, bypassing the Save > dialog's conversion, be the use case? Yes -- More specific. I would be inclined to interpret "save" as store (as loseless). I tend to see current implementation actually as export behaviour (depending of file format). Even svg imaged are transformed (and save currently even break things) Extracting is the zip is not that conveniened.. not user friendly and kind of technical.. Also not everybody is aware of impact of reconversion. Or needing that. And currently jpg export dialog not working properly (but that's more short sighted argument (on state of instead of the long term vision). Pain point especially dpi suggestion based on screen resolution. But in any case still reconversion..</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>