<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:79045_79045@mail.ru" title="Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79045@mail.ru>"> <span class="fn">Roman Kuznetsov</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Windows installer display tiny icon under high resolution"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138841">bug 138841</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Ever confirmed</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>1
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>rizmut@libreoffice.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>UNCONFIRMED
</td>
<td>NEW
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Windows installer display tiny icon under high resolution"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138841#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Windows installer display tiny icon under high resolution"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138841">bug 138841</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:79045_79045@mail.ru" title="Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79045@mail.ru>"> <span class="fn">Roman Kuznetsov</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Mike Kaganski from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=138841#c3">comment #3</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to V Stuart Foote from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=138841#c2">comment #2</a>)
> > Roman, Mike, * can the MSI itself be made dpi aware?
>
> MSI *is* DPI-aware. And all its dimensions are, in fact, in special units
> related to a font size scaled to the screen resolution [1].
>
> It is obvious that our installer does follow the resolution properly on the
> screenshot, if you look at the top banner with "6".
>
> The problem here seems to be because of using ICO images for these specific
> problematic places (and Icon type in Control.idt), not BMP (and Bitmap type).
>
> The Icon type [2] has some bits that might be related, namely FixedSize and
> IconSize, and maybe we can just modify those, and not change the type.
>
> [1] <a href="https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/msi/installer-units">https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/msi/installer-units</a>
> [2] <a href="https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/msi/icon-control">https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/msi/icon-control</a></span >
I think we could rework all icons into bmp format instead .ico and then use
Bitmap type instead Icon type in configure files.
>From another side we already have all icons in SVG format in
<a href="https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/instsetoo_native/inc_common/windows/msi_templates/Binary/">https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/instsetoo_native/inc_common/windows/msi_templates/Binary/</a>
but I'm not sure MSI installer can use SVG directly inside
Rizal, can you add icons in BMP format from existing SVG files in address
above?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>