<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Save Image to PNG has no DPI written into the file" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132959#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Save Image to PNG has no DPI written into the file" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132959">bug 132959</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:wilhelm.nuesser@fhdw.de" title="WN <wilhelm.nuesser@fhdw.de>"> WN</a> <pre>I'd like to second Roberts remark. Exporting the same odg-File with LO 6.1 gives the following png information obtained by imagemagicks identify -verbose: Format: PNG (Portable Network Graphics) Mime type: image/png Class: DirectClass Geometry: 1183x925+0+0 Resolution: 118.3x118.3 Print size: 10x7.8191 Units: PixelsPerCentimeter Type: TrueColorAlpha ... Exporting the same file with LO 6.4 and 7.0 from LO website the header reads now: Image: TCP-Header.png Format: PNG (Portable Network Graphics) Mime type: image/png Class: DirectClass Geometry: 1183x925+0+0 Units: Undefined Type: TrueColorAlpha Obviously, the fields resolution, print size are missing and the field units is left undefined. Using the standard equation: no_of_pixels = dpi * inches the information in the new header format is not sufficient to deduce the size and/or the resolution. gimp, inkscape, imagemagick et al thus have to assume a resolution ... and choose the standard of 72. IMHO this looks really like a regression in the 6* series to me... BTW: platform for tests is Linux Mint 19.3</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>