<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - The break to paragraph (being a line) or linked to paragraph content"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137151#c14">Comment # 14</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - The break to paragraph (being a line) or linked to paragraph content"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137151">bug 137151</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com" title="Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Mike Kaganski</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Telesto from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=137151#c13">comment #13</a>)
<span class="quote">> Problem is also terminology. Using "page break" for "paragraph page breaks"
> is kind of breaking the silent convention about the meaning page break.
> There is kind of 'settled' terminology in the world of Office Suites,
> (object oriented). And the LibreOffice one does look like/behave like a
> 'regular' page break, until..
>
> So feels like LibreOffice re-inventing the meaning.</span >
Usual "I am used to another suite" bias in disguise of talks about
"conventions". LibreOffice roots are in 1980s, when *word processing* component
of future StarOffice was created first. Then the concepts were only being
created (with different suites following own concepts), and no, LibreOffice is
not inventing it here, it is using something established long ago. And things
like <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=137151#c13">comment 13</a> are just another way of telling "no matter what, I want it like
in MS Office".</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>