<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:telesto@surfxs.nl" title="Telesto <telesto@surfxs.nl>"> <span class="fn">Telesto</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - UI: LibreOffice Community in Title bar"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139335">bug 139335</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>italo@vignoli.org, thb@libreoffice.org
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - UI: LibreOffice Community in Title bar"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139335#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - UI: LibreOffice Community in Title bar"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139335">bug 139335</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:telesto@surfxs.nl" title="Telesto <telesto@surfxs.nl>"> <span class="fn">Telesto</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to V Stuart Foote from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=139335#c1">comment #1</a>)
<span class="quote">> It is already added, but just as the branding artwork slug on the Help ->
> About dialog
>
> That is sufficient--the new "branding" tags do not *need* to be in the
> 'ooName' decorating the frame. Especially if there is any substantial CSD
> change for <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Support for Client Side Windows Decorations in LibreOffice"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=113388">bug 113388</a>
>
> IMHO => NAB
>
> =-ref-=
> <a href="https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/107820">https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/107820</a>
> <a href="https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/107918">https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/107918</a></span >
Adding Italo & Thorsten. Seeing this also as matter of marketing and topic for
BoD
It's brought up in the mailing list a few times.. not sure if a final decision
being reached on it.
Don't think the current approach - with very subtitle pointer to community -
delivering the idea of Marketing had in mind.
I really prefer an explicit decision up the chain. And getting it done for 7.1.
Instead of subtle try out with an extended debate to 7.2 release for where
'Community' should be placed (or not).
The BoD decision left out the details. The worker bees decided to do the
minimum. But well would want to have the burned of aggressive branding with
'authorization'
So my 2 cents about the outcome.. however I do like a final decision from organ
(BoD) who is in charge, responsible (and accountable).
It's ultimately their decision; and having to cope/handle the fall-out/ angry
mob (the less appreciated part of BoD job description). The dictate the course
we are heading.
It's not up to me, Italo, ux-members. We might have preferences ourselves. But
this is about 'greater good' (whatever that means).
And the worker bees need to ultimately executing what's decided up the chain
(or will be done one way or another).
We can prefer or dislike it, etc.. but matter of lobbying at members or attempt
a coupe on the current BoD [a coupe is not advised, IMHO]
Italo has 'lost' already something. He has cope with 'Community'. Not it his
favorite for marketing reasons. Time will tell if he was right.. Nobody will be
fully content with the outcome, I estimate.
--
For the record: this is a 'general comment' implying anything. But I find it
curious that the old revert approach 'Personal Edition" was prominent all over
the place, in the worst possible form, while currently approach being oddly
subtle/mild.
---
And maybe this should be discussed somewhere else.. but well, I presented it as
a task :P</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>