<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - AutoCorrect in LO-Writer changes as from version 7.0.4.1 forcibly “daß” (traditional German spelling rules) to “dass” (reformed German spelling rules)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139377#c11">Comment # 11</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - AutoCorrect in LO-Writer changes as from version 7.0.4.1 forcibly “daß” (traditional German spelling rules) to “dass” (reformed German spelling rules)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139377">bug 139377</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:dirk.wun@t-online.de" title="Dirk W. <dirk.wun@t-online.de>"> Dirk W.</a> <pre>@Ming Hua: I have looked at your picture and I am surprised that you have a “daß”. This is not the case with me (see attachment). I have looked at the discussion <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - Old Replacement in german language" href="show_bug.cgi?id=131510">Bug 131510</a> - Old Replacement in german language. The statement of Thorsten Behrens (CIB), “‘dass’ is no longer correct.” is definitely wrong: “To clarify, I say again: The official rules are initially binding only for the schools and the authorities. Beyond that, everyone can write how he wants and how he thinks he will be understood. Accordingly, anyone who continues to use the old spelling rules is not writing incorrectly, but traditionally. The new spelling rules will set an example.” <a href="https://www.kmk.org/presse/pressearchiv/mitteilung/neuregelung-der-deutschen-rechtschreibung-ab-01august-wirksam.html">https://www.kmk.org/presse/pressearchiv/mitteilung/neuregelung-der-deutschen-rechtschreibung-ab-01august-wirksam.html</a> As I said in my initial description: Both spellings – traditional as well as reformed – are still valid. And: I maintain that NOBODY needs this change requested by Thorsten Behrens, even if it has been implemented in the meantime. WHY supposedly the change desired by Thorsten Behrens is needed is not clear from the discussion in <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - Old Replacement in german language" href="show_bug.cgi?id=131510">Bug 131510</a>, perhaps Thorsten Behrens can comment on this again. So please undo the patch, because a) nobody needs it and b) it only hinders those who stick to the traditional spelling.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>