<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - - sporadic fail! - combination of autocalculate and shared formulae still broken in 6.3.0.0.alpha1+ with threaded off" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320#c27">Comment # 27</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - - sporadic fail! - combination of autocalculate and shared formulae still broken in 6.3.0.0.alpha1+ with threaded off" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320">bug 125320</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:matthewnote@yahoo.co.uk" title="matthewnote@yahoo.co.uk">matthewnote@yahoo.co.uk</a> <pre>(In reply to Michael Meeks from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=125320#c26">comment #26</a>) > It is safe to say that if a broken file produced by an old version of calc > is required to reproduce the problem, then it's not that interesting to us. Understood. > Then again - if we are confident that older versions of calc produce unhappy > files we can potentially detect and force re-calculate of those on-load (I > guess) - that is reasonably easy to do. Got it. Xisco Fauli was/is looking for help to do that for <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - EDITING, FORMATTING: diagram didn't automatic update when change variable (recalculation not triggered)" href="show_bug.cgi?id=86321">Bug 86321</a>. Buovjaga's tracing it for a few years. LO7 (fresh) is still unable to show unhappy files with X,Y scatterplots broken-then-working, so it's at that stage. I contribute user workarounds. Engineers and scientists are clicking,holding and stirring all their plots a few pixels to keep going. A real renovation on-load is hoped for there. > If the problem can be reproduced from a blank-sheet in a modern LibreOffice > then that is -extremely- interesting =) but having a new bug report with a > clean set of reproduction steps: starting from launching calc and adding > (presumably large range formulae) etc. would be extremely interesting. > Thanks. Working on it (for this Bug here and others where I can).</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>