<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Insert table in Impress insert a huge table (cell size). It's was more decently proportioned in the past" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139512#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Insert table in Impress insert a huge table (cell size). It's was more decently proportioned in the past" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139512">bug 139512</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:telesto@surfxs.nl" title="Telesto <telesto@surfxs.nl>"> Telesto</a> <pre>Initial report was based on me 'disliking' it, but lets try to give some arguments * Table size isn't consistent.. Take maximum number of rows the table picker allows (in toolbar).. cells are smaller compared to 5 rows * The insert table in maximum amount of rows overlapping the 'Title area'. Not thing you mostly want. You like only need 5 rows to achieve that * The square suggests rather large content.. which isn't the case * The size of the table cells kind of unconventional * The table has fit to table content size feature.. why expand those cells in advance.. you have to downsize again * I personally find those square size ugly. I originally thought there was some fundamental idea behind it. But well appears to be more circumstantial coincidence And there are few other bugs which make working with tables in Impress harder (getting the outer cell.. or being able to resize top or bottom row).. however those are actual (different) bugs.. However if the size would be 'normal' the bugs related to resizing would be obvious. More an 'additional' circumstantial argument fitting my plea..</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>