<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org" title="Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org>"> <span class="fn">Heiko Tietze</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Rework auto-correction mechanisms for better UX"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139397">bug 139397</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>---
</td>
<td>WONTFIX
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>UNCONFIRMED
</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Rework auto-correction mechanisms for better UX"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139397#c7">Comment # 7</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Rework auto-correction mechanisms for better UX"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139397">bug 139397</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org" title="Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze@documentfoundation.org>"> <span class="fn">Heiko Tietze</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Telesto from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=139397#c6">comment #6</a>)
<span class="quote">> Remains what <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - AutoCorrect in LO-Writer changes as from version 7.0.4.1 forcibly “daß” (traditional German spelling rules) to “dass” (reformed German spelling rules)"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=139377">bug 139377</a> expressed related to daß and dass. </span >
Not every request makes sense and is often rather a personal preference or
individual workflow. In this particular question, the Duden clearly states
"dass" instead of "daß". See <a href="https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/dass">https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/dass</a>. The
orthography reform was in 1996 and 25 years later we should really comply.
Dirk's statement "traditional German spelling is still valid" is just wrong.
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=139397#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> It is rather functional, and frankly needs no attention.</span >
Agree. What I could imagine is to have the list available for extensions. That
would allow people with special demands to switch away from the standard.
(In reply to Telesto from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=139397#c0">comment #0</a>)
<span class="quote">> The original situation was an auto-replacement for dßs by daß.</span >
This was always present as a typical typo. The actual question is the grammar
correction of "daß" into "dass" (and "dßa" to "dass").</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>