<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - On Writer's standard TB replace current "Text Box" a draw shape (.uno:DrawText) with the interactive frame with column (.uno:InsertFrameInteract) control"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139606#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - On Writer's standard TB replace current "Text Box" a draw shape (.uno:DrawText) with the interactive frame with column (.uno:InsertFrameInteract) control"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139606">bug 139606</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> <span class="fn">V Stuart Foote</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Well sure, the menu change would be part-n-parcel to the TB change.
Replacing the Insert -> Text Box (now .uno:DrawText) with "Text Frame" (to use
a frame with column .uno:InsertFrameInteract).
The "Text Box" (.uno:DrawText) could shift to the Insert -> Shape
The complexity comes with all existing documents, extensions, documentation,
and user work flows for Writer that have been DrawText focused.
The TB and Menu changes are easy, the cultural changes not so much.
Is it a good idea and better UX--probably. Should it be done--I don't know.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>