<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - [UI] Demote Chapter in navigator" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139302#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - [UI] Demote Chapter in navigator" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139302">bug 139302</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> V Stuart Foote</a> <pre>I'll defer to Jim R. But in 'Content Navigation View' these are not just the "Headings" rather their associated content, i.e. the "Chapter" between the heading levels. Promote also means "move upward in a hierarchy"; Demote means "move downward in a hierarchy". So while Promote and Demote are a little awkward applied for [Chapter] relocations, in this Navigator tree view of a document's outline, these control lables are consisten with the "Promote [Outline] Level"/"Demote [Outline] Level" controls present in the same block. I don't perceive a reason to adjust, and not sure anything would be better. The "Move heading down/up..." or "Move chapter down/up..." of OP offer no real improvement--and I suspect l10n would have issues compared to simple promote/demote use.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>