<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Libre Writer - Tables - Column Width handling" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139109#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Libre Writer - Tables - Column Width handling" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139109">bug 139109</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:telesto@surfxs.nl" title="Telesto <telesto@surfxs.nl>"> Telesto</a> <pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=139109#c5">comment #5</a>) > (In reply to Telesto from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=139109#c4">comment #4</a>) > > This is not end-user friendly. I call it even bad User Experience (UX). So > > UX department should 'care' about this bit more. > > The ticket was about "doesn't work". We likely do have another requuest for > a better UI, that's why my take is still NAB/WF (or duplicate). No objection . but please give some kind of summary suggestion (or create a bug yourself) which is UX proof. I created 3 additional bugs (see duplicate + duplicates there).. Which all being closed. It feels like a kind of filling bureaucratic forms which requires a certain format to be processed, but people given a blank paper (not a form) with always end up with a stamp "denied" or "not admissible" because not matching criteria And a certain point I'm out of idea's of 'solutions' and stuck with only a problem description without clear alternative solution. Whereas problem descriptions without solution direction is seen as to unspecific/undirected and closed because that.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>